Qwen 3.8 max beat fable 5 in real world AI tests
Open models are catching up fast, with cleaner UI and stronger agent performance.
Your AI isn't slow.
YOUR SETUP IS. Most people don't need another AI model. They need an AI operating system.
I gave Qwen 3.8 Max a typo-filled prompt for an Angry Birds-style game using frogs, birds and poop emojis.
🐸🐦🐦⬛🦜🐸 One prompt later, “Angry Friends” was running locally. The gap between dumb idea and working prototype is disappearing fast.
Qwen 3.8 max, GPT-5.6 luna and kimi K3 are free in one agent that keeps working after you close the tab
Conol, the workspace An agent that drafts and edits your notes, schedules its own check-ins and keeps memory across sessions: Bind Telegram or
Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen 3.8 max
Opus nailed it 🔥🔥 SpaceX Falcon 9 launch, stage separation, boostback, and landing simulation using three js
Same prompt, same task different models
Model and cost - Kimi k3 - Grok 4.5 - GPT-5.6 Sol - Qwen 3.8 Max who won?
Qwen 3.8 Max just beat hundreds of human teams in a live contest.
And barely anyone is talking about it. Here's what Alibaba's new model actually did: → It worked alone for 5 days straight, 125 hours, rebuilding a…
I asked Claude Opus 5, Qwen 3.8 Max, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Kimi K3, based on their taste in art, which animal represents them aesthetically
Then told them to create their own signature with that animal here is their results
Qwen 3.8 Max can work for 10 days straight.
By itself. Not 10 minutes. Not 10 hours. Ten DAYS of nonstop building.
Meta just dropped Muse Spark 1.2.
It got tested against GPT 5.6, Fable 5, and Qwen 3.8. The honest results nobody else will show you: → Most game builds came out laggy, buggy, and…
China's Qwen 3.8 Max vs Fable 5, the world's #1 model.
Same screen. Same prompts. Three real jobs. No do-overs. The winner is not the one you'd guess: → Job 1: a full landing page. Job 2: a calculator.
Qwen 3.8 Max just dropped.
And it's free to try. Forget benchmarks. 45 real demos put it to the test: games, websites, even a full operating system.
Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Soul.
Same prompts. One shot each. No do-overs. The real winner isn't the one the headlines push: → Test: Flappy Bird, Tetris, and a real landing page.
Alibaba just dropped Qwen 3.8 Max.
An open model is now beating paid ones at using a computer. Most people missed this completely.
Qwen 3.8 Max Full COURSE 1 HOUR (Build & Automate Anything)
هل بدأت الصين فعلاً تتفوق على أميركا في الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ قد يبدو السؤال صادماً لكن ما يحدث اليوم يدفع الأسواق لطرحه
📌 علي بابا كشفت عن نموذجها Qwen 3.8 Max، وتقول إنه يتفوق على أقوى نماذج أنثروبيك في بعض الاختبارات ▪️ قبل أشهر توقع كثيرون أن قيود الرقائق الأميركية…
I tested Qwen 3.8-Max vs Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol using the exact same prompts.
No retries. No prompt tweaks. Just one shot. Here's what surprised me...
Everyone is arguing about the wrong AI model.
The best model changes with the job. That's what almost nobody tells you. Same prompts. Three frontier models.
The interesting thing about Qwen 3.8 Max isn't just the final result.
It's how much of the task it can handle on its own. I gave it the goal, and it worked through the coding, 3D environment, interactions, and dynamic…
Qwen 3.8 Max is insane.
I just built a 3D version of Paris complete with the Eiffel Tower, roads, rivers, and city layout in under 30 minutes. One prompt. One model.