Same model, two names, two doors.
Anthropic announced Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 yesterday. I think this is where the confusion begins. There are different interpretations. These are not separate intelligences. It's actually the same model. The difference here is who can do which job. Fable 5.1 is available to everyone.
Opus 5 + higgsfield: the web design industry is worth $60 billion.
Most of it is overhead. I just proved it with $20. $60 billion. that's not revenue from websites. that's revenue from everything around websites. the offices. the salaries. the meetings. the tools.
Claude Fable 5.1 just set a new AI performance record, and it's only a 0.1 update.
No flashy new name. No big launch. But it DOUBLED the last version on the hardest test. The numbers: → Science benchmark: 24 → 52.6 in 3 months → Beat Anthropic's own heavyweight, Opus 5
A pretty wild Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Opus 5 test
Four Three.js physics scenes, including a balloon popping, water simulation, mushroom cloud, and live atom model. Gemini passed the same physics checks for $0.12 vs. $1.86 for Opus 5 — while generating every scene in under 70
You have reached the end of the archive
All of Claude Opus 5