Fable 5 vs opus 5. same game.
Same characters. very different results the goblin on top is fable 5. sitting properly, expressive, details on the hands, correct proportions the goblin on the bottom is opus 5. sitting sideways, red eyes, holding a coin, still recognizable but
Grok 4.6 just locked in #1 on CursorBench for real-world coding.
Not only is it sitting at the top of the performance chart, it’s also on the efficiency frontier. Frontier-level coding results at a cost most models can’t touch. Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol… all behind.
GLM 5.3 Max vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5
GLM 5.3 Max is actually holding up really well here. My ranking for this run: Opus 5 > Qwen 3.8 Max > GLM 5.3 Max > Grok 4.6 Definitely competitive now. GLM is getting scary close.
I programmed a new single prompt game with Claude, but this time I made it much more challenging
I gave him a photo of my living room and asked him to create a 3D game in which the protagonist is a baby and his goal is to throw and eat as many things as possible before I catch him.
You have reached the end of the archive
All of Claude Opus 5