Are cheaper LLMs now good enough for PLANNING phase?
I tested Astra, DeepSeek v4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 Max (not Flash) to prepare a plan, from a client spec. Then Opus 5 "judged" them. A 1.5-minute clip.
Read this twice. The most important AI released this month doesn't generate text.
Jev, from TypeSafe AI, refuses to write. You send it a state and a typed question — yes/no, pick from options, score on a scale — and it returns a…
I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js.
Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me.
I asked Opus 5.5 to make a short film about the history of film photography.
This is what it put together on its own over the course of an hour and a half. only used 6% of my 5 -hour limit, and 2% of my weekly limit.
How to cut your AI bill by 60% switching to Opus 5.5
Most people will swap the model name, save 24%, and stop there. The other 37% is sitting in your settings.
Claude Opus 5.5 turned my 5-day Hokkaido road trip (札幌・小樽・美瑛・旭川) into a 2-minute drone show, ending with the rear-end crash we actually had on day 5.
One-shot, no manual fixes. GPT-6 Sol version within the hour.
Anthropic CEO after release of Claude Opus 5
The 5.5 opus programmatic animations are impressive.
I tried to create one like pleometric's, with a loose prompt, no example images/video, and no animation or art libraries.
Game engines are dead. You are not looking at Minecraft or Unreal Engine 5.
You are watching Claude Opus 5.5 render and play an interactive 3D world in real time purely through code. What is happening on screen: 1.
Opus 5.5'i test ettim: JavaScript ile Monet tarzı tablolar yaptırdım.
Tablolarda görsel modeli, Photoshop ya da hazır kütüphane yok. Her pikseli Opus 5.5'in sıfırdan yazdığı kod hesapladı. Nasıl yapıldı: 1.
Opus 5.5 just dropped and i plugged it into nerve within an hour.
It self verified its own trade thesis three times before firing. +5 eth in one session. repo: every model before this proposed trades.
Day4， 今天发布了这几个重磅模型，Opus5.5最牛逼，一句话把我的小鸡啄米图站起来了，把我看呆了
凌晨： GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Luna Claude Opus 5.5 下午： Qwen-Audio-3.1 5个模型 蚂蚁的 Ming-Image-0.1-Design 系列 Day5会是谁呢？预测一波，肯定是Qwen-Image-3.1
Test on my side was one prompt
Design the rewards so Microduck traces my daughter’s drawing, run the training loop, record it in Blender. 24 automated iterations.
Claude Code（Opus 5.5 ultracode）に1時間24分で、クオリティそこそこの遊べるゲームができた。
Opus5.5はなんというか熟れた感じが良いね。Fableのような自律的な尖った感じは無いのだけど、これはこれで扱いやすい感じがする 詳細は以下 ⓪ 「2時間で最新メガタイトル級のゼロヨンゲーム」を頼む
The next AI leap may not be a smarter answer — it may be a cheaper AI worker.
Anthropic says Claude Opus 5.5 hits roughly Fable 5.1-level performance on most work at ~40% lower cost than Opus 5: $4/$20 per MTok, cache reads…
Opus 5 vs Opus 5.5
A frontend creative coding challenge 🧸🚀 Both built a 3D “Tiny Toy Factory” web experience.
Built with Claude Opus 5 in one shot....
But designed in Figma first! I’m loving this workflow. BTW, this hero was redesigned for Citelity by edgrows!
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra for GTA style car chase
Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5. Now live in frameo_ai
1855. Daniel McCallum draws the first org chart for the New York and Erie Railroad
Because nearly 500 miles of track got too big for one man to watch. 1856. Opus 5.5 gets one prompt, "a golf game," and draws its own.