DeepSeek V4 Pro just scored 87.9 on Terminal Bench 2.1.
That matters because this isn’t another “AI answers questions better” benchmark. It tests whether an AI can actually finish tasks inside a computer terminal. And DeepSeek built V4 Pro around exactly that.
DeepSeek-V4 Pro Max vs Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.5 Max
Testing 2M+ Token Context Retrieval & Complex Code Synthesis: 🔹 DeepSeek-V4 Pro Max: Fastest inference & cost-efficiency for massive codebases (98.4% Needle-In-A-Haystack accuracy). 🔹 Claude 5 Opus: Unrivaled structural
DeepSeek Harness is an agent harness where every component is a plugin, built on Cordis for spatiotemporal composability.
Run it via `npx deepseek-ai/dsh web` to get a local Web UI at port 3080. Explore it here:
NVIDIA DGX Spark with DeepSeek V4 Flash vs. Sonnet for Pac-Man clone creation.
DeepSeek finished in 5 mins, Sonnet in 10. Both functional, but DeepSeek's speed and audio impressed, despite a few glitches. Which AI wins your vote?
You have reached the end of the archive
All of deepseek