DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) vs Qwen 3.8 Max
GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6
GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.
Advanced Frontier LLM Coding Benchmark 2 14.08.2026
Models: - Opus 5 Max - Claude Code (App) - Qwen 3.8 Max - Qwen-Code (CLI) - GLM 5.3 Max - Zcode (App) - GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra - Codex (App) Task: Ferrofluid: Rising towards metaball surface + magnet cursor
Qwen 3.6-27B just embarrassed a model 14X bigger.
Alibaba’s 27B model is beating its own 397B flagship on coding. But the benchmark score isn’t even the most useful part. Why this matters: → 27B dense model — all parameters fire on every token → 77.2% on SWE-bench Verified
You have reached the end of the archive
All of qwen38