Benchmarks don't show a model's true capabilities, but specific tasks do.
The same task for GPT-6 Astra, Fable 5.1, Grok 4.6, and Opus 5 A tank game with voxel graphics, for 2 players via WebSocket and three.js
GPT-6 Astra is truly terrifying 😨
As a designer, I was confident that artificial intelligence would not outperform me in design... Until Astra came and turned everything around 🔄 He actually uses Figma, builds entire pages, from BI to UI with very high quality. Fable 5, Opus 5, even GPT-5.6 haven't reached this level. The question that concerns me…
Anthropic leaked a file that builds a 12-PERSON team for $0 - and that team builds a business doing $1.4M a year
A 12-person team would cost you $50,000 a month, this one costs exactly zero and shows a result in 5 days root → contracts → staff → gates → clock → back to
Test command of 3 agents Gemini 3.8 Flash / Claude Fable 5.1 / GPT-6 Astra with the same commands created with Claude OPUS 5 as follows.
As a result, the GPT-6 Astra wins in terms of gaming aesthetics. (According to the clip, you'll only get this because you didn't let it think for itself.) The second best work is Claude Fable.
You have reached the end of the archive
All of Claude Opus 5